The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Provide a model of innovative practice
|
|
The value placed by the organisation on leadership and innovation is promoted and reinforced Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective leadership styles and the use and benefits of innovative work practices within workgroups are identified and shared with workgroup members Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective leaders reflective of a range of leadership styles are identified and workgroup members are provided with opportunities to learn from them Completed |
Evidence:
|
Innovative work practices are modelled and encouraged in the workgroup Completed |
Evidence:
|
Barriers to innovation are identified and addressed with the workgroup Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organise workgroups to develop innovation and leadership
|
|
Performance requirements for the workgroup are analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is gathered about workgroup members in accordance with legislation, policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Strengths and weaknesses of individual workgroup members are identified in a manner that takes account of cultural and individual differences Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup roles are assigned to match individual capacities and leadership styles to work requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Selection and assignment of workgroup members is made to foster sharing of ideas Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organise work assignments to facilitate innovation
|
|
Work is structured and allocated to support rather than hamper innovation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Work assignments are communicated to workgroup members in ways that encourage and reinforce workgroup-based innovation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tasks and activities are allocated to ensure the best use of workgroup skills Completed |
Evidence:
|
Timeframes and resources that allow for innovation are included in work assignments Completed |
Evidence:
|
Support workgroup to develop leadership and innovation
|
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to work collaboratively on work assignments Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to share work information, knowledge and experiences in their day-to-day work Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to seek external stimuli and knowledge and to set up and maintain networks that support the development of leadership and innovation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Guidance is provided to workgroup members in ways suited to their current knowledge and experience on the use of innovation skills Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to take a leadership role at different times throughout work assignments in accordance with their strengths or development needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are coached to ensure they have the enabling skills to underpin the development of leadership and innovation skills Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor innovation and leadership development
|
|
Workgroup members are actively encouraged to reflect on activities and opportunities for innovation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup activities are evaluated based on feedback from workgroup members, management, clients and other interested people Completed |
Evidence:
|
Suggestions for work improvements made by workgroup members are encouraged and implemented in line with organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Reviews of the application of innovation and leadership skills are recorded and presented as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
The development process is reviewed and both positive and negative outcomes are discussed and constructively analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide feedback on innovation and leadership development
|
|
Feedback from review processes is discussed within the group and used to inform future innovation and leadership planning Completed |
Evidence:
|
Different leadership styles and their value in providing inspiration or closure at various points in the innovative process are acknowledged Completed |
Evidence:
|
Successful innovations are celebrated in accordance with organisational policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Problems in the use of innovation skills are discussed and resolved in a constructive way Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide a model of innovative practice
|
|
The value placed by the organisation on leadership and innovation is promoted and reinforced. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective leadership styles and the use and benefits of innovative work practices within workgroups are identified and shared with workgroup members. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective leaders reflective of a range of leadership styles are identified and workgroup members are provided with opportunities to learn from them. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Innovative work practices are modelled and encouraged in the workgroup. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Barriers to innovation are identified and addressed with the workgroup. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organise workgroups to develop innovation and leadership
|
|
Performance requirements for the workgroup are analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is gathered about workgroup members in accordance with legislation, policy and procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Strengths and weaknesses of individual workgroup members are identified in a manner that takes account of cultural and individual differences. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup roles are assigned to match individual capacities and leadership styles to work requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Selection and assignment of workgroup members is made to foster sharing of ideas. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organise work assignments to facilitate innovation
|
|
Work is structured and allocated to support rather than hamper innovation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Work assignments are communicated to workgroup members in ways that encourage and reinforce workgroup-based innovation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tasks and activities are allocated to ensure the best use of workgroup skills. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Timeframes and resources that allow for innovation are included in work assignments. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Support workgroup to develop leadership and innovation
|
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to work collaboratively on work assignments. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to share work information, knowledge and experiences in their day-to-day work. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to seek external stimuli and knowledge and to set up and maintain networks that support the development of leadership and innovation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Guidance is provided to workgroup members in ways suited to their current knowledge and experience on the use of innovation skills. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are encouraged to take a leadership role at different times throughout work assignments in accordance with their strengths or development needs. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup members are coached to ensure they have the enabling skills to underpin the development of leadership and innovation skills. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor innovation and leadership development
|
|
Workgroup members are actively encouraged to reflect on activities and opportunities for innovation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workgroup activities are evaluated based on feedback from workgroup members, management, clients and other interested people. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Suggestions for work improvements made by workgroup members are encouraged and implemented in line with organisational requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Reviews of the application of innovation and leadership skills are recorded and presented as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The development process is reviewed and both positive and negative outcomes are discussed and constructively analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide feedback on innovation and leadership development
|
|
Feedback from review processes is discussed within the group and used to inform future innovation and leadership planning. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Different leadership styles and their value in providing inspiration or closure at various points in the innovative process are acknowledged. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Successful innovations are celebrated in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Problems in the use of innovation skills are discussed and resolved in a constructive way. Completed |
Evidence:
|